Sadness to Madness
Speechless.....
A community of people who strive everyday to understand their place and role in todays' world; try desperately to come to grips with their short-comings; and evaluate and challenge what they believe and hold to be true.
Speechless.....

ould Teach the Bible in Public Schools.” Read it. I have to strongly agree as not only are we the most ignorant when it comes to math, reading and writing but also to religion and how it impacts everything from politics to current events. We have also become oblivious to our loss of personal freedoms as the ACLU has taken charge of the courts and stripped them away piece by piece under the false premise of protecting the feelings of a random few. Separation of Church and State was never intended to mean freedom from religion or its’ constructive influences or ideas.
Labels: Self

rable than the -20 made possible through our 47 mph wind chill factoring. Just today another earthquake struck the island of Sumatra but fortunately, since it was land based, no tsunami would result. However with over 70 killed and hundreds wounded, there will be much need there. Consider making a contribution to efforts made by the Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies. You may do so here: http://donate.ifrc.org/ Indonesia is also dealing with an airliner crash in which at least 8 but up to 54 were killed as the plane caught fire and became engulfed in flames upon landing. Thank God many escaped. For the one's who didn't, please pray for their families. It's a hard season in Indonesia.
ou have shared in trying to enlist their help, say for one cop with great instinct but no friends within the force. And together, you and he, unlikely allies, negotiate the treacherous lair set up for your demise by your well-funded, and tool-enabled foes. It's a likely story resulting in millions in opening day ticket sales and an exhausting, sweat-soaked, dream festered sleep. I want you to consider the man who has had everything taken from him in Jobian fashion and one who has had maybe 1 child taken while the kidnappers insist that whatever action he takes against them will result in his other children or wife being taken or killed. Leverage. They have him considering now what he has to lose by taking a particular action. He must make smaller, safer choices. Nothing visible. Nothing with the mind-set that "If this fails..."

I want to welcome you all back as I am committed to restoring routine blog activities. Well, here we are. It's 2007 and I don't feel a day over, say 40. I am on the road as usual, in NJ and came down with a flu bug. Makes one feel like I had a successful day as a speedbump on the Mass Turnpike.



So, do you like watching movies, clips and shorts? I do. Here's a mix that I'll hope you enjoy.
Crazy news lately. I was fascinated by the poll of the national media which found that 67% of reporters, pundits and editors believed that the United States mission in Iraq was failing miserably. While 78% of our military personal on the ground in Iraq felt things were going well and as planned. I'm more predisposed to believe the ones who are actually on the front lines doing the work than those sitting at their wall-facing-desks a thousand miles away.
Everybody has heard the latest on K-Street politics that hit the press from CA earlier this week. Congressman Randy "Duke" Cunningham tearfully resigned his post after admitting to taking as much as $2.4M in bribes in return for driving business towards particular defense contracts. It is still not yet altogether clear how the co-conspirators, Mitchell J. Wade, president of Washington-based MZM Inc., and Brent Wilkes, head of San Diego area defense contractor ADCS Inc., will respond to the court submitted documents charging them with bribery. This may, as I believe we will find, open up a rusty can of righteous worms and expose the hypocrisy rampant amongst the progressive corporate lobbyist and those elected to conscript laws on our behalf. It is well understood that the lobbyist actually play a huge part in the actual drafting of many laws and bills, but the back-scratching has profited both sides of the Avenue. Just not the voters or our trust of those involved. I do give Rep. Cunningham credit for oweing up to what he has done, admitting it publicly, apologizing for it publicly and willingly taking his punishment like a man. Hear his public announcement here. Whether Democrat, Republican, or Bostonian, actions deemed illegal must be dealt with swiftly and openly. I hope that this starts a fire under the entire Washington Federal bureaucracy encouraging them to make themselves accountable to their constituents for their decisions and actions. Maybe then, we'll see it trickle down to the State levels of government as well.
I am and have always been concened as to what people allow children to be exposed to and at what age certain things should and need to be discussed. Having 5 children at an assortment of ages, I have found that there are no set rules by age but by maturity and other social and relational factors. I tend to be conservative, and probably a little over protective, having seen the negative effects on our youth culture over the years of negative exposures that they either report to me or I find out about.
Jesus went throughout Galilee, teaching..., proclaiming..., and curing every disease and every sickness among the people. (Matthew 4:23) Note, Jesus healed EVERY-one.

Let me be up front with my readers about the fact that I am still markedly undecided about the use of human embryo or clone derived stem cells. As a scientist, I am piqued at the possibility of any substantial key discovered in the fight against the diseases and bodily disintegrations that plague mankind today. I am awed by the awesome intricacies of the human design and the powerful mind-power we have to investigate and comprehend it in laboratories around the world. I am frightened by the prospect that someone will abuse the capabilities uncovered by science resulting in harm to mankind physically, socially, psychologically, emotionally, culturally, morally, and spiritually. I am equally cognizant of the fact that when you give man an inch, he then blasts off into space before you even discover that he’s no longer on the planet.
They say “there are two sides to every story” but I have found that this debate has many sides. The following are a potpourri of viewpoints that I encounter on a daily basis and that may or may not represent your thoughts on this debate. There are those who would say “let’s throw off the gauntlet of morality for it is nothing more than opinion and run full-force into the yet undiscovered potential of scientific discovery.” Cloning in all its’ majesty should be allowed, even for the creation of “spare part.” Maybe it’s o.k. to clone animals, bacteria and corn but not people. Some would argue that morality is best decided but that which results in the greater good. Many have decided for themselves that since embryos created for In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) are just going to be discarded, then we should not waste the but use them for the betterment of mankind through research. Maybe the creation of an embryo for both IVF and for stem cell research is morally wrong but since it’s going to be done anyway, then we should have proper safeguards in place to prevent abuse. There are some who insist that it’s o.k. to create embryos for IVF but not for destruction for research purposes. Many in the world believe that life begins at conception, that all life is sacred and that it should be protected and not used for research. A lot of people I talk to would like to see some alternatives to the destruction of an embryo in order to avoid the current passionate debate. Many newer techniques for Stem Cell “acquisition” have been developed recently which is beginning to “address” this issue by working around it. There are a lot of undecided individuals floating and bouncing somewhere in-between each of the aforementioned. Have you found where you fall amongst these choices? Have you thought long and hard about it researching the facts or merely repeating media by-lines? What is there to gain? Where would a slippery slope take us? What are the potential downfalls? These all need to be considered, discussed and weighed out.
Maybe the name Dr. Hoo Suk Hwang causes you to shiver. Maybe it causes you to bow in worship. Maybe you haven’t heard of him. He’s the researcher from South Korea who is breaking ground, and possibly even moral laws, through his developments and scientific accomplishments in human and animal cloning. I’m sure you heard about the recently cloned dog and the reports of a successful, living human clone. Are you concerned? I am not surprised that this happened first in a nation in a region where life has historically been disposable. There are less of the moral “restraints” that one would encounter in the west. Oddly though, much of Korean culture considered your age to include time spent in the womb. But who am I to point out that coincidence. I think that the reason that China didn’t beat them to the goal was due to funding issues, slower momentum in China, and a little luck. But it would have been done regardless. Now what? Is he a hero, hypocrite, or human whore? Will he become the Mack-Daddy pimp of stem cells? People thought for the lat dozen years about whether they could do it. Now they need to think about whether they should do it.
What is the next new horizon for mankind? Cloning for body parts? Remember, it was China who historically slaughtered prisoners and immediately surgically removed their body parts. Sounded ethical since lives would be saved, right? Except there was the fact that some of those murdered were in prison for things such as propaganda against the mother-land, for attending a non-state-sanctioned Christian church or for political dissent. And, since testing was not up-to-par, many diseases were transmitted from these transplanted organs. Some even made their way to the U.S. where it is expressly illegal to acquire such trafficked organs.
Now what? Sex selection? Exactly. A funded study at Baylor University will study the effects of sex selection on families. Their goal? It is to ultimately demonstrate that there are no negative effects from selecting the sex of your child. After all, look what it did in countries such as China? They are scrambling now with such an almost completely male society to reverse the trend which caused female infanticide to become commonplace. Where are the feminists and women of NARAL when only females are being killed?
It will be only a matter of time once sex selection is “normalized” that one will be able to select embryos that will yield a particular hair or eye color, weight predisposition, or personality. And so, the great Aryan experiment continues in the bedrooms and Petri dishes of the world today. So, as the debate moves forward, it must do so with full consideration of the results, good and bad, moral and immoral, possible and not yet possible, until we are willing to safeguard ourselves, others and the yet unborn who will ultimately be sacrificed either as cells, or as parts for our benefit.